For the Chairman & Group Owner
The Owner Dashboard.
Your group, in focus.
Six surfaces. Six daily decisions. Every signal a school group produces — brand health, branch rank, teacher quality, dropout risk, network escalations — composed into one operating view the chairman runs the group from.
Scroll the keynote — one act per surface, one decision per act.
Every campus. One screen. Every morning.
An owner running three branches today opens three WhatsApp groups, two spreadsheets and a quarterly review deck — and still cannot answer the simplest question: which branch needs me this week?
Edullent collapses the group into a single board. Brand health index, branch-by-branch attendance, fee trajectory, today's escalations — composed into one operating view that lives at the chairman level. The morning starts with a decision, not a meeting.
A group-level operating view that composes attendance, academics, fee collection and escalations from every branch into a single ranked morning read.
Signals it reads
- Daily attendance marked at every branch
- Assessment and term results as they are entered
- Fee collection and outstanding ledgers
- Escalations raised by principals and teachers
What the engine computes
- A composite brand-health score, 0–100, per branch and for the group
- Week-over-week movement, so a steady number and a sliding one never read alike
- Cross-branch normalisation — a 400-student campus stays comparable to a 2,000-student one
- The one branch whose movement most needs the owner this week
Decisions it drives
- Which campus to visit, and which to leave alone
- Which escalation to take personally, and which to hand to a principal
- Whether a dip is one branch or a group-wide pattern
Brand Health Index
A composite 0–100 score per branch and group — attendance + marks + fees + parent NPS — comparable week-over-week and campus-to-campus.
Branch-of-the-day
The dashboard surfaces which campus needs the owner this week. Not gut-feel, not the loudest principal — the data picks.
Decision queue
Three suggested moves every morning — sign-offs, escalations, transfers — composed from the underlying signal.
Sign-in to network-wide clarity
Owner time recovered from review meetings
Your franchise health, ranked.
Most groups do not know they are stagnating. Each branch reports proudly on its own gains; nothing surfaces the relative truth — who is actually pulling the brand up, who is dragging it down.
Edullent ranks every branch on the same composite the principal sees. A board-ready leaderboard with 6-month trend lines, ranked KPI strip, and an AI panel that explains what the top branch is doing the others are not. The chairman walks into the next AGM with the answer already on screen.
A weekly ranking of every branch on the identical composite the principals are measured by — one ledger for the whole group, not one per campus.
Signals it reads
- Attendance discipline per branch
- Academic results across grades and subjects
- Fee collection rate and recovery speed
- Six terms of history, so trajectory is readable and not just this month
What the engine computes
- A single composite metric shared by the owner, principal and teacher views
- Rank plus slope — the trend turns before the absolute number does
- The gap, in points, between any branch and the leader
- A weekly cached narrative naming what the leading branch is doing differently
Decisions it drives
- Which branch practice to standardise across the group
- Which principal to reward, and which to support
- What to put in front of the board without building a deck first
Composite ranking
Branches ordered on the same composite metric the principals are measured by. Identical math, identical truth — no two ledger problem.
6-month trend lines
Per-branch trajectory across the last two terms — the slope reveals which campus is on the way up before the absolute number does.
"Why they win" AI
A weekly-cached narrative explains the specific signal driving the leading branch — pacing, retention, fee discipline — sourced from real metrics.
Refreshed network-wide ranking
Per branch / yr from cross-branch best-practice transfer
See who is winning — and who is sinking — by Friday.
Comparing branches across a group usually requires the group office to wait for monthly reports, copy them into Excel, and reformat them into a slide. By the time the comparison lands, the operational moment is over.
Edullent ships the comparison live. Every branch against every other on five operational metrics — students, teachers, attendance, average score, fee collection — best-in-row marked, gap surfaced, AI explanation of why one is leading. The Monday review becomes a 5-minute confirmation, not a 2-hour build.
Every branch measured against every other on the same five operational metrics, refreshed continuously instead of assembled monthly in a spreadsheet.
Signals it reads
- Enrolment and teaching headcount per branch
- Attendance percentage
- Average academic score across the branch
- Fee collection performance
What the engine computes
- A live branch-by-metric matrix with no manual consolidation step
- The best performer on every metric, identified automatically
- The size of each gap in points — not merely the order
- A plain-English read on why one branch leads a given metric
Decisions it drives
- Where to move a teacher, a resource or a budget
- Which branch to pair with which for best-practice transfer
- What to raise in the Monday review — before the review
5-metric matrix
Every branch × every metric in one table. The eye finds the weakest cell instantly — and one click drills into the underlying class, teacher or cohort.
Best-in-row marker
A star against the leader on every row makes "who to learn from" unambiguous. The conversation moves from blame to imitation.
Comparative narrative
AI surfaces why one branch is ahead — without the chairman having to triangulate three reports. The reasoning is in plain English.
To build a board-ready cross-branch comparison
Comparison cycles per year vs monthly review decks
See the dropout six weeks before they leave.
Across a multi-branch group, dropouts surface as a fee-collection problem two months after the academic problem started. By the time the finance team escalates, the family has already chosen the competing school down the road.
Edullent scores every student weekly across attendance, marks, behaviour and engagement — tiered Critical / At-Risk / Watch / Recovered, with the specific signals named on every card. The owner sees the at-risk pool by branch, the new-this-week delta, and the intervention list. Dropout becomes a prevented event, not a reported one.
A weekly per-student risk score across the whole group, so a dropout is named while it is still preventable rather than counted after it is not.
Signals it reads
- Attendance pattern over recent weeks
- Score trajectory, not only the latest mark
- Logged behaviour and discipline incidents
- Assignment submission and engagement history
What the engine computes
- A multi-factor risk score per student, recomputed every week
- Tiering, so attention lands on the most urgent group first
- The specific signal behind each score, named in plain language
- Quarterly re-weighting against what actually happened to last term’s cohort
Decisions it drives
- Which families to contact this week, before the decision is made
- Which branch carries a concentration of risk and needs help
- Where to fund counselling, tutoring or a fee restructure
4-tier classification
Critical · At-Risk · Watch · Recovered. The chairman knows exactly how many students across the group are about to leave — and how many were saved last quarter.
Reason-coded cards
Each at-risk student arrives with the specific signal — attendance at 48%, marks down 24%, behaviour incident logged Tuesday. No interpretation work needed.
Auto-recalibration
The model re-weights itself every quarter against outcome data. The longer the group runs Edullent, the better the model gets at its specific patterns.
Earlier than term-end reports surface the same student
Prevented annual fee leakage per 1,000-student branch
Your best and weakest teachers — across every campus.
In a group of any size, the chairman has no reliable read on the teaching bench. Each principal has their favourites; HR has their lists; the truth lives in the student outcomes — which nobody is aggregating up.
Edullent composes a single composite teacher score across the network — attendance discipline, class average, parent NPS, grading speed — refreshed every Friday. Filter by branch, by subject, by tier. The chairman knows who to promote, who to pair with a mentor, and who to let go — with evidence the principal cannot dispute.
One outcome-weighted teacher score computed the same way at every branch, so the teaching bench can be read across the group instead of campus by campus.
Signals it reads
- Class averages and how they move term over term
- Teacher attendance and punctuality
- Parent feedback
- Grading and assessment turnaround
What the engine computes
- A composite per teacher, comparable across branches and subjects
- Rank within the full network, with a tier band attached
- Coaching pairs matched by subject and grade band
- A weekly refresh rather than an annual one
Decisions it drives
- Who to promote, who to pair with a mentor, who to move
- Which subject department across the group needs intervention
- How to defend a renewal or a raise with evidence a principal cannot dispute
Outcome-weighted score
Four signals merged into one number per teacher across every branch in the group — the only fair lens for cross-campus comparison.
Auto mentor pairings
The engine pairs teachers needing coaching with the right top performer — same subject, same grade band — turning the group into a self-improving system.
Network rank + tier
Each teacher carries a rank against the full group and a tier badge — the basis for raises, transfers and renewals.
Average class-score lift after one coaching cycle
Recognition cycles per year vs annual reviews
Critical issues reach the chairman in seconds.
In most groups, a crisis at a branch is something the chairman hears about days later — usually because a parent escalated to a board member. By then the headline has been written somewhere uncomfortable.
Edullent's alert spine flags severity-tiered events as they happen — attendance crashes, fee defaults, teacher attrition, NPS dips. One-tap delegate to the right principal with the trail captured. The chairman shows up first, not last.
A severity-ranked escalation spine that carries branch-level incidents to the group owner as they happen, with the trail captured for governance.
Signals it reads
- Attendance collapses at class or branch level
- Fee defaults crossing a threshold
- Staff attrition and unfilled positions
- Parent sentiment and complaint volume
What the engine computes
- Severity tiering, so the queue is ordered by consequence and not by clock
- Branch and owning principal attached to every event
- A one-line summary composed from the underlying numbers
- An audit record of who acted, when, and what they decided
Decisions it drives
- What to handle personally and what to delegate, in one step
- Which recurring alert is a process problem rather than an incident
- What to show an auditor or a board without reconstructing it later
4 severity tiers
Critical · High · Medium · Resolved-30d. The owner inbox is ranked the way operations actually work, not by chronology.
Branch-tagged context
Every alert arrives with the originating branch, the AI-generated one-line headline, and the relevant principal already named.
Audit trail
Who acted, when, what they decided — captured automatically for governance and board-pack reporting.
Owner-side escalation latency, vs days
From alert to delegated decision
The chairmen who'll build the next chain
won't be the busiest. They'll be the most informed.
Edullent gives the owner one screen for the whole group — and one move every morning. The principals catch up to that clarity within a term.
Book a Demo